Please scroll down for minutes from previous meetings:
2010: 25 February; 24 May; 15 July (to follow)
2009: 5 February; 2 April; 11 June; 10 September; 22 October (AGM); 14 December
(minutes prior to 2009 are stored offline; please get in touch if you would like to see them)
***********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON MONDAY 24 MAY 2010
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary/ Treasurer), Sylvia Gascoyne, Jackie Japhet, Jane Evans, Suzanne Parwaroo, Lola da Costa and Councillor Nancy Jirira.
1) Minutes of last meeting: the minutes of the last meeting were agreed as an accurate record.
2) Matters Arising:
i) Discussion with Claire Howard from Camden Recycling Team: it was noted that Claire had said she would take suggestions made at the meeting back to the team. Those present wondered whether this had happened and what follow-up and/or feedback there would be. Joan offered to write and send comments from the minutes to Rachel Stoppard or relevant officer to seek feedback. FRA recognised there was an issue for the council in responding to EU targets re recycling. Sue – FRA was not questioning this, but whether the “one size fits all” approach in just rolling out existing scheme which the best things, as there was very mixed opinion in effectiveness in FRA area (as evidenced by comments from residents at last neighbourhood forum). Lots of the green and brown bins lay unused or wrongly used in gardens in the FRA area.
ii) Gondar Gardens – issue re redevelopment – latest position uncertain. There was a suggestion to research London Wildlife Trust for Gondar site as it should be a recognised wildlife site and may have official wildlife designation.
iii) Give & Take Event at Emmanuel School: Sylvia and several others had donated items and some people went to get items. James said they carried out on-site testing for electrical items. Unsure as to whether Camden will continue to do them in light of cuts to budget.
Councillor Nancy Jirira advised that there would be changes due to change in council ruling political group & general election. She advised that the Scrutiny groups would continue at this stage, but other changes are in the process of being finalised. Safer Neighbourhood Teams would be relocated in the heart of the community they serve (eg new SNT base in West End Lane near the tube). Future of Area Forums uncertain – no date set yet for next one.
iv) Joan advised that she had attended the recent AGM of CAWH. The focus is now on the refurbished premises in Broomsleigh Street, although the ground floor is now being used by the former Sington Nursery (relocated from the Mill Lane Open Space site), so CAWH has top floor only.
v) Issue re TESCO’s in Fortune Green – sale of alcohol sale licence hours reduced following strong deputation by local residents, supported by Councillors Flick Rea and Nancy Jirira, plus some conditions placed on parking and restricted delivery which was to go to planning.
3) Talk by Representative from CAWH (Community Association for West Hampstead). Lawrence Higgins was unable to attend due to a conflicting commitment of a CAWH Board Meeting.
4) Chair’s Report:
a) Noticeboard and benches for Fordwych Road area: Joan reported on these 2 items which had gained funding through the Area Forum. The Church had been in agreement regarding the citing of a Community Noticeboard to the left of the entrance between the Church and Davina House. Unfortunately the Davina House residents had been opposed to this and rejected the citing of a noticeboard here. James felt the reasons for this decision were not clear, and all present felt this was an important missed opportunity as the funding may not be available again. Other locations were discussed although most felt the Davina site was the best location for upkeep and changing of notices/community news. Other sites suggested was corner of Minster Road and Fordwych, outside the new 59a Maygrove Road development on the wall, by the NO 1 Mill Lane entrance, outside Fordwych Nursery, entrance to Maygrove Peace Park or by new entrance to Iverson Road Train Station.
b) Bench: main aim was for people to be able to rest on way to Jubilee Tube and/or buses on Shoot-up-Hill. Locations considered – corner Minster Road by bridge, St Cuthbert’s Road, or Garlinge by bus-stop(although this one already near tube). Joan to contact Maxine to relay this but may be problem with delay and funding no longer available.
c) Festivals: Joan reminded all present that the Jester Festival was taking place on Fortune Green on Sat 3rd and Sunday 4th July. Kilburn Festival was on Sunday 11th July in Kilburn Grange Park.
d) Joan reported that she would be sent minutes regarding update on Local Development Framework and would report back.
e) Planning Applications: Joan reported on planning applications relevant to FRA area including 36 Fordwych Road, 8 St Cuthberts, and 16 St Cuthberts. Nancy brought up concerns that a development for 7 bedsits brought up issues regarding designated space for rubbish and recycling.
Vice Chair’s Report:
i) Fortune Green Safer Neighbourhood Team – had produced newsletter recently. Particular success covered was that of youth engagement in Dodgeball Team organised by SNT police with staff and youth members at Sidings Community Centre. They had joined London-wide Dodgeball team, involving team with both police and youth members.
ii) Local crime statistics showed lowering of crime – 15 burglaries and 19 vehicle crime in March/April 2010. Priorities were now residential burglaries and youth engagement.
iii) SNT had moved to new shop-front premises in West End Lane, nearly opposite the tube
iv) WHAT – had new newsletter although those present noted its limited circulation to local people.
v) No 1 Mill Lane – now old house removed, site empty and plants starting to return which some locals liked. Suzanne Pawaroo said that residents from Mill Court noticed it was much better now old house removed as it was causing several problems.
vi) Cricklewood – “the Cricklewood Improvement Group (CIG) organising several events – such as Cricklewood Clean-up day o 13th June at 9am. FRA was signed up member of Anti-Brent Community Development scheme – spearheaded by Danny from Cricklewood Homeless Concern. James would keep FRA posted – would update on website if relevant.
Any Other business:
a) Joan drew attention to all present that Camden Green Fair would take place on Sunday 6th June in Regents Park.
b) Jackie brought up several items –
i) noted that the Ham & High newspaper seemed to have an ongoing running commentary regarding the Cricklewood Development Scheme – usually quite critical.
ii) Rubbish was being kept on site on corner of St Cuthberts and Fordwych Road
iii) Mentioned very useful item to be purchased from Poundland which clipped purse to a handbag and increased safety against theft.
iv) Problem of footbridge by Brent Cross Shopping Village – was suggested it could be taken up with Transport for London. Councillor Munro Palmer was asked to urge TFL to re-route 266 bus – FRA applauded Jackie’s actions.
Other AOB items:
a) Sue mentioned that an Organisation called the Sheila McKechnie Trust can organise workshops on “how to run a successful campaign” – and wondered if anyone from FRA would be interested. She would find out more details and report back.
Next Meeting: Thursday 15th July 2010 at 7.30pm.
***********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2010
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary/ Treasurer), Sylvia Gascoyne, Jackie Japhet, Jane Evans, Councillor Nancy Jirira and Claire Howard from Camden’s Recycling Team.
Apologies: apologies were received from the following people – Isobel Woodruff, Councillors Flick Rea and Russell Eagling, Suzanne Pawaroo, Chris Catton, Heather Thompson, Jacqui Harding, Carol Thomas and Lola da Costa.
1) Talk & Presentation by Claire Howard from Camden’s Recycling Team.
Claire outlined current position regarding Camden’s changes in approach & strategy to recycling, after which she invited comments and discussion from all present.
Claire explained that changes in recycling had been brought about due to a number of factors, following a study 2.5 years ago and a need to comply with EU and national targets. Camden currently recycles 30% of waste, but this needs to increase to 45% by 2015. A variety to ways to increase % had been explored, including comparing the merits of single versus co-mingled recycling, with other issues factored in (eg distance of vehicular travel). Some areas being considered were:
• food and garden waste
• paper and card being separated – 70% increase in value for selling on value – bring revenue in
• start collecting glass in separate colours – enables some glass to be recycled back into reusable glass
No clear agreement on this at present.
Following pilot in Belsize, changes being brought in were mainly concerned with the addition of food and garden waste – Fordwych being one of first phase of residential areas being rolled out. Local FRA residents were by now familiar with the green and brown waste food disposal containers and the white garden waste bags. Plans were being implemented to extend scheme t larger housing estates and blocks/complexes under a communal programme.
Claire then invited comment from all present and the following points were raised in a Question and Answer session:
Sylvia – where does food waste go?
Claire – to site in Edmonton where it was processed into compost and sold into agriculture – some back to LBC for allotments.
Sue – outlined some problems regarding practicalities of using the green and brown bag system. (some points having been raised at recent local Forum):
• many green and brown bins were still lying around in gardens unused
• some people were using brown bins as rubbish bins – but the dustbin men didn’t take them as they thought they were recycling, and the recycling men wouldn’t take them as they were clearly rubbish – so we had a problem of unsightly, gathering and overflowing rubbish
• the practicalities of using the green and brown bins in houses of multiple occupation such as many in Fordwych did not seem to work
• hygiene aspect – might help if we could have bio bags – could buy these if knew where – rice bags. Camden could inform re suppliers
• some people did not have space for green bins in small flats/kitchens
• everyone seemed to like the white garden waste bags – great
Claire: outlined 2008 pilot scheme in Belsize – successful indicators that residents used scheme 1 in 3 rate but admitted that maybe one size fits all scheme had its flaws.
James – 2 points – need to re-inform people on regular basis about use of bins – suggested using “Your Camden”– sent out mailings – eg with council tax. Issue one of continued awareness and information as to how to use scheme in area of quite high turnover of residents on short stay. Confusion as to what containers are for.
People made several suggestions re this:
- Fridge magnets
- Stickers on doors
- Branding for service
- Peel offs for bins
- A4 stickers to renew or update
Jane – current green bins for plastic – lids don’t work – not fit for purpose- better to have lids attached which don’t blow away.
Sue – could we investigate smaller wheelie bins – better design – have a range from residents to choose from as appropriate to area – Nancy – different design for different people. Big job – must get it right to engage residents fully. Veolia – need to monitor contract. Recognise different in FRA to Belsize.
Sue & Jane – reiterated all committed to recycling – must maximise residents capacity to recycle in best way – design not necessarily working in Fordwych – not enough green boxes – overflowing – become waste hazard rather than benefit – rats been spotted.
Larger containers might be better as current green bins were often overflowing – indication that people were keen to recycle but capacity provided by Camden not sufficient.
Claire – agreed best to provide tailor made boxes – fir for purpose – shared commitment – council and residents – nothing to stop residents buying their own.
Sue – suggested Camden negotiate special discount rates for range of bins from suppliers– might encourage more people to buy container suitable for them.
Claire to take away comments, suggestions and recommendations to team and report back.
2) Acceptance of last minutes from December 2009 – agreed by those present.
3) Matters Arising:
i) No 1 Mill Lane – nothing to add - the old building had now been demolished although there were no other signs of activity.
ii) Programme of Improvements to pavements and roads – north of Minster to Mill Lane. James advised that the pavements off Fordwych (eg Ebbsfleet, Manstone, Richborough, Skardu) – to be done in 2010/11.
iii) 59 Maygrove Road Development: James reported that, sadly, planning approval was granted in December 09 for this scheme to go ahead – another significant development in the area to which there had been a lot of opposition. There had been some conditions imposed – 1.7 meter high screening to be installed at rear of 4th & 5th storeys. Decommissioning of underground petrol tanks – in accordance with pollution controls. Docmentation on website for those interested.
iv) West Hampstead (Rail) Interchange: not too much objection to proposals so far
v) Local Area Forum – James and Joan reported on update re benches and noticeboards. After discussion – suggested that best location for noticeboard was outside St Cuthbert’s and/or corner of Maygrove and Fordwych Road.
vi) Crickelwood – phased development – James – signed up in behalf of FRA to coalition opposing scheme for redeveloping Town Centre – www.brentcrosscricklewood. 2026.
4) Chair’s Report:
Joan brought up following Planning Applications approvals:
1) No 2 Mill Lane – new-build on side of existing property. Will overlook nursery – permission granted.
2) Flat in rear garden of No 2 Richborough Road – alterations to rear outbuilding (storage area and bedsit) – install new pitched roof
3) 161 Fordwych Road – erection of single storey rear extension to residential flat
4) 1 Gondar Gardens – erection of 3 x 2storey dwellings (2 bedrooms) and 1 x 2 storey plus basement-level 3 bedroom dwelling house following demolition of existing part 1, part 2 storey single dwelling house and adjoining 3 bay garage
5) 117 Fordwych – creation of new side dormer and 2 velux windows
6) 168 Fordwych – Use of existing flat roof as roof terrace at 2nd floor level, plus alterations to north-west elevation at ground floor level
Other items for local people:
Trip organised by WHEART to Woburn on Sunday 28th February
Give and Take Event on Saturday 28th March at Emmanuel School
Local Development Framework – Joan and James had emailed response on preferred approach and priorities. Expressed concern regarding prospect of 1 – 2000 new Homes for West Hampstead area if no improvement to existing community and local infrastructures.
Car Club: Minster Road Car Club – space proposed will not now proceed – alternative locations to be explored.
Joan advised that the new CAWH AGM was on Tuesday 9th March – although some people had said that 8-10pm was a bit late for some people.
5) Vice-Chair’s Report
i) James advised that there was an updated newsletter from the Safer Neighbourhood Team – and a new emphasis on doing more work with the local youth.
ii) Jubilee Line Closures – advised that these are likely to go on until October 2010. James had been present when Boris Johnson (Mayor for London) had visited – had heckled him along with others regarding disruption and possibility of refund against loss of service when people had paid for week ticket – going on for too long!
iii) Cricklewood Community Forum –James involved with Steering Group for Town Centre Manager – quite a lot of enthusiasm for this.
iv) James reported that he had received complaint from Chris Catton on the ongoing problem of rubbish at the corner of Ebbsfleet and Cricklewood Broadway. Had had walkabout with Mark Hunt from Camden Street Cleaning where he had been shown problem. Chris had written email which James had forwarded to Councillors and Mark Hunt.
v) Gondar Gardens – issue to planning development now re-emerging – must keep eye on this.
vi) Forthcoming elections – James said that FRA has to be seen to be impartial and advised that councillors must abide by laws covering election periods. James warned he may be busy around election time.
****************************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON MONDAY 14 DECEMBER 2009
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary/ Treasurer), Sylvia Gascoyne, Jackie Japhet, Chris Catton, Rob Tomkinson, Justin Apollonio, Mohammed Masters, Heather Thompson, Jennifer Black (Fortune Green SNT), Pat Conyngham (Fortune Green SNT), Tatty Sloane (Kids Company), Councillor Nancy Jirira.
Welcome and Introductions: All present introduced themselves.
Apologies: apologies were received from the following people – Isobel Woodruff, Councillor Flick Rea, Christine (Warden at Davina), Jane Evans, Suzanne Pawaroo. Joan also told the meeting that she had given Christine some flowers on behalf of FRA to say “thank you” for assistance with use of the common room at Davina over the last 12 months.
Minutes and Matters Arising from AGM and Meeting on 22nd October:
Joan reminded all those present about paying subs (re request at AGM). Membership status of Jackie and Rob to be clarified/confirmed.
No 1 Mill Lane – James updated that the old building had now been demolished although there were no other signs of activity.
Programme of Improvements to pavements and roads – north of Minster to Mill Lane. James reported that Road surface seems OK in Fordwych, but not in roads off. Chris had investigated pavement inconsistencies in repairs – Sue had suggested requesting details of the contract and who was responsible for “checking” work done to satisfaction?
59 Maygrove Road Development: James had submitted complaints to planning proposal on behalf of FRA. Planning Application to be heard at meeting on Thursday 17th Dec 09, but noted that similar proposal had been turned down in 2001.
West Hampstead (Rail) Interchange: James reported on concerns raised by himself on behalf of FRA regarding the Iverson Road pedestrian crossing and the West End Lane/Iverson Road corner Junction, especially as since the recent consultation the 2 properties on the corner by the bridge had been given eviction notices. This was not included in the consultation.
Feedback from Area Forum from Joan and James – in particular noted the proposed items in local budget for community spend – 2 main items for priority affecting Fordwych were those of benches and notice-boards.
Agenda Items:
1) Safer Neighbourhoods Team – Jenny and Pat gave brief overview of crime statistics and priority action areas. Pat – crime generally had fallen – particularly those related to burglaries and motor-vehicles. Anti-social behaviour – not as big a problem in the ward as previously, and youth disorder currently on the decrease.
Jenny gave presentation on scheme for Crime “DNA” packs – which was a practical way to assist in identifying stolen goods. This consisted of a glue-like substance with small dots or particles in it, which were uniquely identifiable and could be pasted onto people’s belongings. Accompanying this was a Registration Card which a person could fill in and hand in to police, after which their belongings would be linked to the DNA “glue” data-base , which could be used to identify and retrieve stolen goods. Jenny suggested where glue could be pasted on certain items, not in obvious places. Every Kit was different. This could be particularly effective in areas where burglary was a hotspot to deter crime – such as Fordwych where there were vulnerable areas such as side passages, railway lands at rear of properties, etc.
Heather commented that it might be difficult to cover whole of road such as Fordwych where there were numerous bedsits in some properties. Some people might be wary or suspicious of being approached by police at the door. Pay said they may have to resort to leaving kits in certain houses. Chris asked if they could include the roads off Fordwych.
Several of those present took packs and filled in registration form, and some took forms for family or friends/neighbours.
Kids Company: Tatty Sloane introduced herself and gave brief presentation on work of Kids Company, who had just taken over lease on 85-87 Fordwych Road. She explained that Kids Company were a Children’s Charity, and at Fordwych they were primarily a centre for Under 16’s, working with Camden’s Services for Children & Families, alongside local primary schools. Their services responded particularly for children with emotional and behavioural problems referred to them. Their opening hours were mainly 3pm – 6pm for children over 11 years offering playcentre type of activities with key workers, and a daytime provision from 9am – 3pm for young people aged 14 – 16 years Monday to Friday. They would pick up children although parents would collect the children. They offer a programme of activities, including craft, homework support, alongside therapy and care plans where appropriate. This programme changes in the holidays to respond to needs of children and parents. They will be having an Open Day in the New Year.
Chair’s Items:
i) Joan reported on planning applications:
- 90c Fordwych Road – part single/part 2 storey extension
- update on 59a Maygrove Road already given
ii) WHEART – Joan reported on event at Mill Lane Open Space on 7th December.
iii) Local Area Forum – she and James had attended area forum in November – particular items of interest were possible benches in or around Fordwych – suggested locations being one on way to Tube for people to rest on, and one other to be cited according to recommendations made by local people.
Food Recycling containers scheme recently introduced - Joan had written to Rachel Stoppard on this issue. Heather reported she had seen a rat around a local bin area. Sue mentioned that in the recent high winds she had to rescue several of the smaller bins from the middle of the road to avoid accidents as they presented a safety problem. Those present re-iterated previous mixed feelings about the scheme, especially as the residents were not consulted before scheme implementation. Whilst all present endorsed recycling, there were several complaints about the reality of using the smaller green bins in conjunction with the larger brown ones. One issue was that of cleanliness and hygiene – lots of properties in Fordwych were in multiple occupation with many bedsits/flats, with people only on short-term lets. It was unrealistic to expect anyone to take it upon themselves to start cleaning the larger brown bins, particularly if shared, which could then pose a hygiene problem. Not everyone had space in small kitchens to store them. Sue said in many dwellings the bins were used as smaller dustbins, which were not collected from, and ended up overflowing with rubbish of an indeterminate nature. Several were left on the street and used as recycling other waste.
It was recognised that the properties were not the same as those around Hampstead where the scheme was first piloted, and people asked about the process of “reviewing” the pilot scheme around Fordwych.
James suggested getting someone from Camden along to the next meeting to discuss the scheme with FRA members. This was agreed.
Vice-Chair’s Report:
James said he had updated meeting on relevant items regarding NO 1 Mill Lane, 59a Maygrove Road, and that the Safer Neighbourhood Police had provided updated crime statistics.
He gave details of the Local Development Framework, which was a planning document looking at issues of jobs, homes, and planning. Responses and views could be made by 15th January 2010. He would put the link on the website. – camden.gov.uk/planning.
He drew attention to the proposed Development in the areas around Brent Cross, and the public enquiry. James would update members on further developments in the New Year.
Date of Next Meeting: Thursday 25th February at 7pm in Common Room at Davina House, 57 Fordwych Road.
James was thanked for providing the seasonal mince pies and mulled wine and everyone thanked Nancy for also bringing some delicious nibbles to our Xmas Social meeting.
***********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 22 OCTOBER 2009
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Suzanne Pawaroo, Carol Thomas, Chris Catton, Jackie Japhet, Jane Evans, Sylvia Gascoyne, Lola da Costa, Jody & Anthony Graham, David James, Heather Thompson, Mohammed Master.
1). Welcome:
The AGM started at 7.35pm with Joan welcoming everyone.
Apologies were received from: Sue Measures, Frank Wibaut, Jilly Little, Jacki Harding, Gemma Raiher, Isabel Woodruff, Cllr Flick Rea.
2). Acceptance of the minutes of the last AGM - 18 September 2008:
These were accepted with no corrections.
3). Chair’s report:
Joan said the website continues to be our main asset. We have to thank James for his work on it & for maintaining our two internet bank accounts. He & Sue have shared out minute taking. James has been the one who distributes the agenda & minutes, and I make sure those without internet access get their mailings. Sue is most helpful with her wide experience of committee procedure. James, Sue & I meet up fairly frequently. We are grateful to members who attend meetings & those who correspond.
There have been changes at 85-7 Fordwych Road. It is now a Kids Company Centre. They were invited to this meeting, but were unable to attend.
We have renewed our membership of Voluntary Action Camden, who give good advice about funding.
We thank residents of Davina House for allowing us to use the common room for meetings for free.
I represent the FRA at WHAT (West Hampstead Amenity & Transport) and KOVE (Kilburn Older Voices Exchange).
4). Vice-Chair’s report:
James said his main areas of activity on behalf of the FRA during the past year had been with the police & 1 Mill Lane. James is our representative on the Fortune Green Safer Neighbourhoods Panel, of which he is now the Chair. He passes information between the Panel & the FRA. James was also involved with other FRA members & members of the Mill Lane Action Group in opposing plans for the development at 1 Mill Lane. He spoke at council planning meetings & argued our case before the Planning Inspector. Unfortunately, the Inspector’s decision did not go our way. However, on the positive side, the issue has brought new members to the FRA and engaged people in the Fordwych area.
Jane said that she had heard from the architect. The empty building on the site is due to be demolished in the week beginning 26th October. The garages on Minister Road will also be taken down; these contain asbestos. Heather said the council charge for empty buildings, so this is probably why the developer is demolishing it now. James said it wasn’t clear if the developer had the funds to proceed with the development at the present time; the planning application is valid for three years. Residents are asked to pass on any concerns about the demolition work; any problems with asbestos should be reported to the Health & Safety Executive.
5).Finance Report & Accounts 2008/9:
Current Account
Opening Balance 517.98
Income 109.00
Expenditure 568.73
Closing Balance (as per Bank Statement) £58.25
Business Interest Account
Opening Balance 1,314.10
Income 9.22
Expenditure 0
Closing Balance (as per Bank Statement) £1,323.32
Treasurer’s Notes:
Fordwych Resident Association ends the year with a balance of £1,381.57
However, due to previous funds raised, some of this balance is designated to providing future FRA activities which are:
*Republication of updated FRA Booklet and future social activities. This would represent about £900 - £1,000.
This leaves an outstanding balance of approximately £400 -£450 which represents a % of fundraising at events and membership fees raised. This is principally for FRA to use for sustaining future activities and minimal admin/running costs – eg website, stationary, and some small miscellaneous costs incurred during the course of FRA business. As you can see from this year’s accounts, this is fairly minimal. This should enable FRA to continue at a basic level on our present scale of expenditure and fortunate use of Davina House for meetings (for which we must record our gratitude).
Items of Significance:
• As agreed, the executive officers opened a new Business Interest Account in November 07 which earned some interest during the year and which can hold Life membership Fees. However, the spreadsheet figures reveal how interest earned has significantly reduced due to the lower interest rate during 2008-09.
• James continues to update the FRA membership list, which clearly details annual and life memberships in electronic form.
• Compared to 2007-08, FRA has had a low turnover in 2008-09, and this gives us a good indication of how we can function at a fairly low financial level, thanks to the input of volunteer skills and time, plus the use of Davina House for which FRA must record a big “thanks”.
• The website continues to be an extremely valuable means of communication to our members and potential members – minimal cost of hosting website but much thanks due to the voluntary input of James Earl.
• Depending on ideas for future events and fundraising, our income & expenditure levels during the next 12 months may increase. Membership fees continue to play a vital role in ensuring our general survival – so please ensure you renew your membership (if not already a life member) & encourage other FRA residents to join!!
The accounts were proposed by Carol, seconded by Chris, and were accepted with no objections.
6). Election of Officers:
(a). Chair: James proposed Joan, seconded by Carol. There were no other candidates. Joan was re-elected.
(b). Vice-Chair: Joan proposed James, seconded by Heather. There were no other candidates. James was re-elected.
(c). Secretary & Treasurer: Jody proposed Sue, seconded by Heather. There were no other candidates. Sue was re-elected.
If there are any volunteers for Secretary, Sue is happy to hand over. For the moment, Sue & James will continue to share secretarial duties.
**The AGM part of the meeting ended**
7). Minutes of last regular meeting – Thursday 10th September:
These were accepted with no corrections.
8). Matters arising:
(a). 85-7 Fordwych Road. Further to her comments in her report, Joan said the Kids Company were very friendly and would like people to call in.
(b). Chris said there still had been no meaningful reply to her emails about the pavement works on Ebbsfleet Road; gravel from the area around the trees continues to spill all over the pavements; street cleaners have become less common in the area.
(c). 59 Maygrove Road. James said the plans were now on the Camden planning website. The plans are for a 5 storey building with 15 x 1-bedroom supported housing units & 14 self-contained (1x3-bedroom; 6x2-bedroom; 7x1-bedroom), all affordable housing. Reference number: 2009/4598/P. The deadline for comments is 10th November. The FRA will object. James will put details & a link on the FRA website.
(d). Lola said people could buy biodegradable waste-bags to put in the brown food waste bins, which prevent any smells & can be disposed of with the food waste. Chris asked where the recycled plastic is processed. Heather said she had seen a rat on the pavement near some food waste bins. Joan will write to the council.
Information about what plastics can be recycled:
http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/environment/news/2009/october/we-now-collect--plastic-packaging-and-cartons.en
Information about what happens to recycled products:
http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/environment/waste-and-recycling/recycling-your-waste/what-happens-to-my-recycling-after-its-collected.en
(e). West Hampstead Interchange. James ran through the results of the consultation on the proposed changes to the street environment in West Hampstead. Most of the recommendations had extensive support. James has the full document if anyone would like to see it. James had also attended an event at the Library about the proposed new Thameslink station entrance on Iverson Road. He circulated information. Planning permission is due to be submitted for approval shortly. Network Rail say they hope the building will be completed next summer.
(f). Joan mentioned a planning application for 46 Minister Road, a single storey extension.
9). New issues:
(a). Joan said the next Area Forum is on Tuesday 24th November.
(b). There is a Hooley at the Broomsleigh Street community hall on Saturday 31st October from 8pm.
(c). There is a revamp your wardrobe event on Tuesday 12th November at Swiss Cottage library.
(d). There was an application for a car club parking space on Minister Road; the FRA supported the proposal.
Carol said the new Community Association for West Hampstead is coming into being. An agreement with the council is due to be signed shortly. Local residents will be able to use the community building at 62 Mill Lane while the Broomsleigh hall is renovated.
James said he had been to a meeting to discuss plans to spend the £10,000 Area Forum budget. Items discussed include benches & noticeboards; as well as Christmas lights for Mill Lane & repainting the Mill Lane bridge.
James said he had been on a walkabout of the Cricklewood area organised by the North West Two Association. Residents & councillors from Brent, Barnet & Camden were there. It’s part of a campaign to improve things on Cricklewood Broadway.
The FRA has joined the coalition of local groups opposing the proposed large development at Brent Cross. Barnet Council are due to consider the planning application next month. There is a call for a public inquiry.
Jackie mentioned her attempts to approve the layout of bus stops/bus routes at the Brent Cross South retail park.
10). Suggestions for the year ahead:
Joan said she was keen to have a table top sale/bazaar in the church hall next year. A large scale social event was unlikely as it requires a lot of work.
11). Date of next meeting:
The Christmas social will be on Tuesday 15th December at 7.30pm at Davina House.
*********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2009
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary/Treasurer), Jackie Japhet, Chris Catton, Jane Evans, Maria Kelley, Jody Graham, Anthony Graham, Suzanne Pawaroo, Frank Wibaut, Gemma Raiher, Lola da Costa, Councillor Nancy Jirira.
Agenda
1) Welcome and introductions:
Joan welcomed everyone to the meeting, particularly those attending for the first time. All present introduced themselves.
2) Apologies were received from Carol Thomas, Sylvia Gascoyne, Isobel Woodruff, Heather Thompson, Councillors Flick Rea and Russell Eagling.
3) Acceptance of last minutes: Sue proposed and Joan seconded the minutes of meeting on 11th June 09 as being correct record – accepted (with correction re Camden & Islington Mental Health Trust reference)
4) Matters Arising:
a) 85-87 Fordwych Road: Sue updated those present on the recent occupation of these premises by Kids Co – an organisation working with children and young people, particularly those considered vulnerable or at risk. They appear to have leased the building from Camden & Islington MH Trust. It was suggested that FRA invites a representative to come along to the AGM or one of our next ordinary meetings in the near future. The group was please to see the premises occupied.
b) West Hampstead Interchange – on agenda
c) No 1 Mill Lane: on agenda
d) Walkbout: James reported there was no further update on this since the last meeting. He had emailed the Highways Department about the state of the pavements, which were being improved in other parts of the area. He reported that he was told there was a phased schedule for improvements over the next 2 years, with the stretch from Mill Lane down to Maygrove being the last in 2011. Nancy raised the issue of the type of slabs being used to replace current broken ones. Jane noted the different pavement on the Brent side of Shoot-up-Hill being more attractive and easier to replace, whilst some felt the older ones kept longer. There appeared to be an inconsistent approach in the improvements works. Chris reported that in the area around Ebbsfleet Road, only some slabs were being replaced, and that the edges near the walls had tarmac surfacing. The pavement finishes round the trees were uneven and messy. Those present felt that FRA should tackle this and James suggested we could ask Martin Reading from Camden to a meeting to discuss this and future works. Meanwhile his email for issues was martin.reading.@:camden.gov.uk . Sue suggested Chris could ask if the tarmac finish and other work matched the schedule of works and if not, who was managing the schedule if pavement only partly being done properly.
e) TFL – Joan reported that funding for the lift at West Hampstead underground was withdrawn which was a cause for concern, although she had not reply about the C11 bunching yet.
f) Local festivals – those present who had attended Jester and Kilburn Festival all felt they were good. Congratulations to organisers.
g) Cricklewood – Sue reported on a recent article in the Ham & High where a group of local residents were asking it to become part of Camden. Sue would give James the article. James had met with other local residents in Brent to discuss raising the profile of Cricklewood and the possibility of forming a Town Centre Manager’s post.
5) Planning issues:
i) 1 Mill Lane: James reported that following the last meeting in June, the Planning Inspector had agreed to the original application for a larger scheme. Jane had a copy of the report, where the Inspector did not note or agree with the groundswell of local concern, and said the 5 storey did not harm any views and seemed reasonable at the time – “not unduly overbearing”. James had seen Daniel who had to raise the capital for the scheme. James had raised the issue at the Area Forum, whereby the Planning Inspector had seemingly ignored collective views against the project – this raised the whole issue of local democracy and the purpose of the council encouraging active participation in planning applications! Jane and James said it was difficult when up against the highly professional legal expert representing the developer who was used to dealing with such issues.
James said the next step was to ensure the developer:
a) secured the boundary before works went ahead
b) liaise and consult with residents regarding the open green space which had not been finalised – particularly re the need for security
It would also be important to continue to monitor the development. There was a short discussion on the demolition of the existing old house (no 1 Mill Lane ) which had presented some problems for local residents , particularly those in Mill Court, re anti social activity – James to email Daniel on this.
ii) 59 Maygrove Road:
James and Sue outlined the new proposals for the old garage property at 59 Maygrove Road, by the One Housing Group. These were exhibited at Sidings Community Centre on 13th July, and James and Sue had given comments on the day. FRA would expect to make a response when the planning application came up (expected in Autumn sometime). There had been concerns regarding the size and nature of the development, with the 29 units being divided into 2 parts – 15 being for individual supported units for those suffering from mental health issues, with 24 hour staff presence. There were concerns about the referral process for those residents and number of units being too high for appropriate support. The issue of regulations around such referrals was raised. Nancy reported on a questionable track record of One Housing Group regarding their landlord capabilities as some of their residents had to resort to legal action (case of Frederick Street), and that this development was being led by funding opportunities and not really the needs of the residents. FRA would try to research more information on One Housing Group, and monitor for application submission and further information on scheme.
Other Planning Proposals:
i. land at rear of No 7 Menelik Rd – 2 storey dwelling for single family
ii. No 2 Mill Lane – James reported on proposed development on the existing small parking area. There was an application 2 years ago, which was rejected – but this scheme may well get approval – another example of lack of confidence in the planning application process not listening to local concerns.
iii. 45 Fordwych Road – ancilliary development to basement into rear garden of basement flat.
Gemma suggested we ask one of the planning officers to attend one of our next meetings to discuss engagement of residents in planning applications, in the light of recent applications.
Parking Consultation: recent consultation resulted in a “stay as we are” situation, although it was pointed out that some of the spaces at the far end of Mill Lane Bridge which were dual CAQ/CAP had recently changed overnight to CAP only. This contradicted the “stay as we are” results – Joan to contact Council and ask why this has happened and for it to be re-instated the same.
6) Food & Garden Waste Collections:
There was discussion on the recently distributed recycled food waste and compost bins & bags, which had been distributed throughout the area. There was mixed feelings as many of the food waste bins seemed to be left lying by rubbish bins, unused. General opinion was that the white garden waste bags were really useful, but for a range of reasons, residents did not seem to be using the smaller bins for reasons of hygiene and difficulties posed for those who lived in flats to use the waste bins to advantage, despite many being committed to recycling. Money had been spent but it appeared Camden may not have got this right.
James and Nancy reported that from October, residents could recycle more plastic goods in their weekly collection – good news!
Chris reported that there was still nowhere for rubbish to be disposed of opposite McGowans in Ebbsfleet Road.
7) Consultations:
West Hampstead Interchange Consultation: James, Joan and Sue had sent in form on behalf of FRA. However, it was also noted that the consultation was flawed as half-way through the process, Network Rail had announced it was due to demolish the 2 properties on the left-hand corner of Iverson Rd on the corner of West End Lane. This did not feature in the consultation and may have influenced the final outcome of certain proposals. The final proposed location of the ticket officer was still not yet known
Emmanuel School redevelopment – all plans approved to extend premises. Sue mentioned that the proposal to remove the left-hand turn into WE Lane from Iverson Road would send local traffic up Mill Lane – leading to more congestion outside the new school premises
Broomsleigh Street Hall/Community Centre: Jodi Graham reported on the progress towards establishing a new group to gain new funding to re-open some of the former premises. Refurbishment to the Broomsleigh St Hall was due to start in the near future, to offer temporary accommodation to the former Sington Nursery (moving from Mill Lane Open Space due to the Emmanuel School development). They would use the lower floors, but the new CA could eventually use the top floor, eventually using the whole building when the nursery moved. In the meantime, the new CA would use some of the 62 Mill Lane Shop-Front property, which would eventually be sold off. Those present felt it was important to promote the CA afresh as some people present were unaware of its aims or proposed activities.
8) Chair’s Items:
As some of the usual Chair’s Items had been reported under the sections on planning proposals and other matters arising, Joan reported briefly on 3 issues:
a) Jubilee Line – weekend closures for remainder of 2009 – lots of people had signed petition complaining about this. Jane voiced concerns as not only was the Jubilee out of action but also the North London Line from Gospel Oak had started to close some weekends as well.
b) Application was received for disabled bay at 121 Fordwych Road
c) Open Day at Sidings Community Centre: Joan reported she had visited Open Day on Tuesday 8th Sept, which had been very successful, with a free lunch, promoting all the services at nearby Sidings Community Centre including lots of classes, computer training, early years and children’s activities.
9) Vice-Chair’s Items: James reported that he had raised issue of planning applications and Cricklewood at the recent Area Forum. There was a new £10,000 fund for the Area Forum – small grants available to engage communities. One idea was a notice-board for the area – there wasn’t one at the moment anywhere. SNT – main crimes were still burglary and vehicle crime, most in the NW2 Fordwych Road area. The recent newsletter highlighted the issue of lack of side entrance/ passage gates being a weak spot in this area. These provided access to gardens where garden equipment could be used to break in. Maria stated a recent example. Police suggested not keeping such equipment outside. Grants were available from Camden to help with this (details in newsletter). The local SNT’s email address was fortunegreensnt@met.police.uk. There was to be a public meeting in the Broomsleigh St Hall on 30th Sept at 7pm.
10) Any Other Business:
a) Chris raised the issue of a parking problem with a nearby taxi firm, which became very overcrowded when the parking regulation times were finished. No firm decision at this stage as to how FRA could intervene in this.
b) Jackie wanted to ask how FRA could support the issue of the difficulties pedestrians faced when accessing the Brent South shopping complex (which included Lakeland) using public transport. Others who had faced this problem also supported this, although the solution was unclear. One suggestion was to come via one route and the go home via Edgware Road if using the buses.
c) Frank raised the issue of noise aggravation from a nearby residence, who when approached had been quite aggressive in responding. It was suggested he contact Environmental Health (Noise Officer) as to how to go forward on this. The issue of flight paths from planes being very noisy was also mentioned.
11) Date of Next meeting: it was agreed to have the next meeting, which would be the AGM, on Thursday 22nd October at 7.30pm at Davina House, followed by Xmas Social Meeting in early/mid December.
***********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 11 JUNE 2009
Present: Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary/Treasurer), Sylvia Gascoyne, Heather Thompson, Jane Evans, Philip Woodward, Councillor Nancy Jirira.
1) Welcome and introductions:
Joan welcomed everyone to the meeting, particularly new member Phil Woodward who is interested in FRA. All present introduced themselves.
2) Apologies were received from Carole Thomas, Jackie Japhet, and Isobel Woodruff. James reported that another person, Jody Graham, had also expressed an interest in FRA.
3) Acceptance of last minutes: Sue proposed and Joan seconded the minutes of meeting on 23rd April 09 as being correct record – accepted.
4) Matters Arising:
a) 85-87 Fordwych Road – Heather had written to appropriate landlords (Camden & Islington Mental Health Trust) although no official update as yet. The general feeling was that eventually they would aim to sell as it was reported the building was suffering from subsidence, although it was not guaranteed. Joan had corresponded with Richard Arthur (originally re trees and blue plaque for Dusty Springfield) – who had in turn written to the executive of the PCT re property. Heather suggested writing to Camden, querying whether it was a good idea to leave property vacant as this could attract pests and squatters. James suggested contacting Councillor Nancy Jirira, who worked for the local PCT who may be able provide advice on how better to proceed with the PCT.
b) West Hampstead Interchange – new proposed ticket office in Iverson Road – consultation underway but no planning application yet posted.
c) Joan reported that Kilburn Clean-up Day had been successful and she had attended a post-event “thank you” lunch at Kingsgate Community Centre.
d) No 1 Mill Lane: James and Jane gave an update since the last meeting. James explained that, following the rejection of the original (larger) planning application in May, the architect/ developers had submitted an application for a scaled down application which met more of FRA’s and other local residents requests. This had been passed. However, the architect/developer had launched an appeal against the rejection of the original application – and this appeal may still be upheld, giving the go-ahead for the larger scheme which FRA and the Mill Lane Group had actively opposed. These objections centred round: lack of affordable housing, density, height & size of property, local compatible appearance, traffic and parking issues, plus lack of clarification of design and future development & management of “green space” backing onto Minster Road. James and Jane had attended deputations at the Council along with other local residents. Jane thought the Barrister representing the developer gave James a hard time – Planning Inspector had requested to visit the view proposed site from 111-113 Fordwych Road – but no notice and therefore couldn’t gain access. Architect/Developer also used argument that “area was run down” which local people may take issue with. However, if this argument gives weight to the appeal, then this should be recognised and used to our benefit when requested local improvement. Joan also advised that the planning application to demolish the 4 storey house on the corner now up for consideration. Outcome of appeal to be known shortly.
e) Walkbout: James reported that, following several complaints regarding the street environment, he had had a walkbout in April with Mark Hunt to see what could be addressed. Main issues were – bins and rubbish, dog fowling, street lights & uneven pavements and pot-holes. Good news – this had had some immediate results – new rubbish bin installed on corner of St Cuthbert’s and Fordwych Rd. Dog mess was a bit more difficult to deal with as no-one wants dog-fowling bin outside their house. Also problem of rubbish outside certain residences. Joan said she would write on behalf of FRA to Camden regarding uneven pavements and risk of people tripping, and James will email. Jane noted that on the Brent side of Shoot-up-Hill paving had been replaced with smaller, granite paving stones which may be able to be better managed.
5) Chair’s Report:
i) Planning applications: Joan reported on the following planning applications –
a) 46 Menelik Rd – erect dormer window
b) 225 Fordwych Rd – rear & side dormer window
c) 21 Fordwych – similar to 225
d) 27 Cholmley Gardens – tree work
The meeting saw no reason to contest any of proposals.
ii) Transport for London – Joan had replied to consultation from TFL re West Hampstead Underground – mentioned concern re need for lift to provide fully accessible transport for all. Also noted “bunching” of C11 buses as creating feeling of unreliability of transport on this important route, particularly as Royal Free Hospital as one of its destinations.
iii) Camden-in Bloom – last day for submitting entries today.
iv) Joan had received communication from Archie Onslow regarding the North London Waste Plan – postponed until later in the year, would be back in touch.
v) Local Festivals – Joan reminded all present of the forthcoming community festivals – jester Festival on 4th & 5th July, and Kilburn Festival on 12th July.
vi) Joan also encouraged local people to attend the forthcoming Area Forum on 15th July at West Hampstead Synagogue, Dennington Park Road.
6) Vice Chair’s report: James reported on the following:
a) Fortune Green Safer Neighbourhood Panel: Burglary still a major issue although down slightly at the moment. West End Sidings Estate – had been some issues with anti-social behaviour re mopeds – but happily CCTV was soon to be installed in Maygrove Peace Park.
b) Cricklewood: James had spoken to NW2 Residents Association re drinking on Cricklewood Broadway which was becoming a general problem. Apparently, Brent now have a policy of “no drinking” on the street. James was to bring the issue of employing a Town Centre Manager for Cricklewood at the Area Forum, particularly important when considering the proposed Brent Cross Development which will impact on the area south nearer to Kilburn/West Hampstead.
c) In his role as chair of Fortune Green SNT, James attended Mapesbury SNT in an effort to increase communication between local SNT’s.
7) AOB: Joan – suggested FRA could put a link to Camden Private Tenants Group on the website. Nancy said she was pleased that WHAT had had an article on NO 1 Mill Lane – which in fact James had submitted as both he and Joan attended these meetings which improved liaison on local issues. There was a brief update on the possible new Community Centre in Mill Lane – currently 2 groups interested in submitting bid to set up new association.
8) Date of Next Meeting: James proposed Thursday 10th September, with AGM later in October, followed by Xmas Social in early December. Agreed.
***********************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 2 APRIL 2009
PRESENT
Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary), Carol Thomas, Jane Evans, Sylvia Gascoyne, Lola da Costa.
1). Introduction:
The meeting started at 7.35pm with Joan welcoming everyone.
2). Apologies for absence:
Heather Thompson, Jackie Japhet, Isabel Woodruff, Jacki Harding, Cllr Flick Rea.
3). Acceptance of last minutes – 5th February:
7(e). Carol was also elected onto the WHAT committee.
4). Matters arising:
(a). James will follow up the offer of a local walkabout with Mark Hunt.
(b). Joan went to a meeting of Homes for Older People.
(c). The FRA will not be making an application for a grant at this stage; the available grants are not suitable.
(d). 85-7 Fordwych Road: James had contacted the owner of the property, Camden PCT; they say they are still deciding what to do with the property and have not yet made a decision. Heather had written to say that she had been at a meeting where it was remarked that the future of the premises is uncertain and it may need underpinning. James had looked into a blue plaque, but the person has to have been dead for more than 20 years; Dusty Springfield died in 1999, so we will have to wait another 10 years! Joan had written to the tree officers at Camden Council to discuss TPOs for the four fir trees at the front of the property. The trees had been inspected and were not considered to meet the tree protection criteria. Sue suggested asking the council to plant plane trees on the street outside the property. If people feel strongly about the trees, they are encouraged to send their comments to the Tree & Landscape Officer: alex.hutson@camden.gov.uk
5). 1 Mill Lane – new planning application:
James had emailed all those on the FRA email list about the new application; residents can view the documents on the Camden Council planning website. The new proposal is four storeys high (down from six) & has 28 units (down from 40). The breakdown is 1x1 bed; 15x2 bed; 10x3 bed; & 2x4 bed. Social housing is 28.5%; shared ownership is 10.7% - giving a total of 39.2%.
James & Joan had attended a public meeting with the architect & Camden planning officer on Monday, which focused on some of the details of the application.
Jane said the architect & engineer had met members of the Action Group to discuss a number of issues. The architect had promised to adopt the Party Wall Act for the development.
There are ongoing discussions about securing the boundary of the site.
James said the FRA would ask for a local group to consider the future of the proposed green space.
On the issue of parking, the new plans maintain the same number of car parking spaces, 20, in an underground car park. James said the FRA is opposed to this – not least because of the entrance on a dangerous curve in Mill Lane & questions about the car lift. There are also questions about visitors to the site, as well as deliveries & tradesmen. Sue raised the question of fire regulations for the car park. James said he would investigate Camden policy on car-free developments.
James said the matter was likely to be discussed at a meeting of the Development Control Committee in May.
6). Chair’s items:
(a). Joan mentioned a North Camden Film Fund screening on 8th April.
(b). Planning applications for our area are: 108 Cricklewood Broadway (single storey extension).
(c). Area Forum: Joan, James & Sue attending the meeting on 18th March on the subject of the West Hampstead Interchange. Residents were given the latest developments on the Thameslink line & construction of the new pedestrian bridge. There will be a new ticket office & station entrance on Iverson Road. A number of concerns were expressed. The grand plans for a wider WH interchange have been abandoned, largely due to the lack of money. There are currently no plans for lifts or redevelopment of the WH tube & overground stations.
It was agreed that the current limited plans for the area are not very well thought out and are uncoordinated. It was agreed that we should take a close interest in the planning application for the new ticket office on Iverson Road when it’s submitted.
(d). Joan & Carol attended the Kilburn clean-up day on Saturday.
(e). The Kilburn Community Choir has restarted.
(f). Joan circulated a newsletter for foundation trust members of the Royal Free Hospital.
7). Vice-Chair’s items:
James said there had been a public meeting of the Fortune Green Safer Neighbourhoods Panel on Wednesday evening, which was well attended. Sergeant Truckle has now left the team, and it’s hoped a new Sergeant will be appointed shortly. There have been a recent spate of burglaries & attempted burglaries; on a number of occasions a group of youths have been seen throwing a football into a garden, and then going to reclaim it, and using the opportunity to break into properties. Residents are encouraged to be on the lookout & report any suspicious activity to the Safer Neighbourhood Team (contact phone number & email address are on the FRA website).
9). Other items:
(a). Lola mentioned that the new Tesco on West End Lane was applying for an alcohol licence starting at 6am. It was pointed out that many other local shops sell alcohol at that time, including Sainsbury’s, which is open 24 hours.
(b). Lola asked if it would be possible for Minster Road to apply to be part of a conservation area. It was pointed out that this was unlikely due to the number of variations in building type.
(c). Carol said there was to be a new clamp-down on illegal DVD sellers on the Kilburn High Road.
10). Next meeting:
The next meeting will be on Thursday 11th June at 7.30pm in the Common Room of Davina House, 59a Fordwych Road.
***************************************************************
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 5 FEBRUARY 2009
PRESENT
Joan Moffatt (Chair), James Earl (Vice-Chair), Sue Measures (Secretary), Carol Thomas, Heather Thompson, Jackie Japhet, Jane Evans, Lola da Costa, Mark Hunt (Camden Council).
1). Introduction:
The meeting started at 7.35pm with Joan welcoming everyone.
2). Apologies for absence:
Maria Kelley, Chris Catton, Cllr Flick Rea.
3). Acceptance of last minutes – 16th December:
There were no corrections.
4). Matters arising:
(a). The changes at West Hampstead Thameslink station have begun; but it was noted the Council have yet to give planning permission.
(b). Chris Catton had emailed to say that the McGowan’s pub at the corner of Ebbsfleet Road & Cricklewood Broadway had reopened.
5.) Camden Street Environment Services
Mark Hunt was welcomed to the meeting. He said his department takes in refuse collections (including white goods & green waste); street cleaners; graffiti removal; recycling; & energy management. They can be contacted via the call centre: 020-7974-6914 or via the Camden Council website.
John Ceconi is the dedicated officer for our ward.
They work with the police Safer Neighbourhoods Teams on dog fouling & dog control.
Their contractor Veolia carries out rubbish collections & is responsible for street cleaning. Their contract has just been renewed for seven years from 2010. James said that the street cleaners in our area are very good.
Heather raised the issue about builders waste & overflowing skips. Mark says enforcement orders can be made on builders.
Mark said his team had helped the police prosecute graffiti offences on the Black Path to the Thameslink station.
Jane raised the issue of dog fouling on Minister Road, and people throwing it over garden walls and into residents’ bins.
There was a call for more bins on Fordwych Road, Minister Road & St Cuthbert’s Road – especially to deal with the litter dropped by pupils walking to and from Hampstead School.
Mark said John Ceconi could do a walk-around with James to highlight these and other issues of concern.
Sue asked about the enforcement of household domestic waste, and cited the example of some properties on Fordwych Road, which have no bins and the rubbish spills out onto the pavement. Mark said they can use the Environment Protection Act to serve a notice on the property owner. He asked for residents to let him know about the problem areas & properties, so he could contact the owners/residents.
Jackie raised the issue of the puddle on the road by 23 St Cuthbert’s Road. Another issue of concern was waste water coming from a property on Fordwych Road, which had iced up over the pavement in the recent cold spell. Mark said there were powers under the Highways Act if the problem affected the pavement.
Sue raised the issue of recycling bins – she said the current design is inadequate and the lids aren’t very good. There was a call for wheelie bins for recycling waste. These issues had been raised at a previous meeting.
Jane complained about the recycling area on Minster Road. She said people dumped rubbish there, particularly at the weekend. She suggested improving the design of the area & suggested moving the bins. Mark said it was possible to arrange for more frequent collections from the bins.
Heather raised the issue of plants growing around the base of trees, and asked for the street cleaners to be careful before they cut them back.
6). 1 Mill Lane – latest developments:
James had met the architect on 14th January.
He confirmed that he was appealing against the rejection of the original plans. James said he had objected to the Planning Inspectorate on behalf of the FRA. The appeal is unlikely to be considered until May/June. James said he was concerned about the lack of information from Camden Council about the appeal. Not all residents appear to have been informed. Those who did received a letter from Camden dated 8th January at the end of the month.
Meanwhile, the architect has drawn up new plans for the site. These consist of a four-storey development, with 28 units. The footprint of the development is the same as before. There are 20 car parking spaces in the underground car park – the same as before. There will be less affordable housing than in the previous development.
The new plans have been submitted to the planning department of Camden Council, but have yet to registered. James will notify members, when the planning application appears on the website.
Worryingly, when the architect met the planners, they suggested he added a fifth floor penthouse as a “crowning feature”.
James said that his aim had always been to achieve a development that was proportionate in scale and acceptable to members & residents. He said being realistic, a development will take place on the site. He said the new plans appeared to be a positive development towards our aims. However, he highlighted the outstanding issues of concern:
(i). Affordable housing – this was the planners’ reason for objecting to the original design, but this is not of major concern to residents.
(ii). Green Space – the architect is suggesting that this would be gated with card access for local residents. The parks department will manage the area and are keen on a nature resource – giving access to school groups, hence plans for a pond, hut & toilets. The view of the FRA is that this should be a decision between local residents & Camden Council, not the architect.
(iii). Height & size – the FRA had asked for a maximum of four storeys (the same as Mill Court); this has now been addressed.
(iv). Parking – the architect said he would have to dig deep for the foundations, and that the banks would not lend to him if the flats did not have parking space. He said technology, sensors, and the party wall act will all help allay residents concerns about subsidence. He offered to have a meeting with his engineer with affected residents.
Sue raised concerns about the car park, and its entrance on a dangerous bend on Mill Lane. She said cars would queue to get onto the car lift, causing congestion. She also asked what would happen if the lift breaks down.
Lola said she was concerned about the digging for the foundations.
Sue said she was concerned about more and longer trains running on the railway line and the impact on the foundations.
James said he would draw up an objection to the new plans and discuss with Joan & Sue.
7). Chair’s items:
(a). There is a planning application for 11 Manstone Road for a single storey extension at the rear.
(b). Joan is on the committee for HOPS (Homes for Old People)
(c). Joan is considering making a grant application for a social event. Joan & Sue will meet to discuss. Sue said she recommended a ‘grass roots grant’ which would be something fun, but not stretching on volunteers.
(d). Joan had attended the launch of the West Hampstead SHOPPP project (Safe Happy Older People & Parents with Push-chairs) on Wednesday. The project focuses on making shops & businesses in Mill Lane more accessible, particularly with step-free access.
(e). The WHAT (West Hampstead Amenity & Transport group) AGM was attended by James, who was elected onto the committee. The meeting discussed the plans for the new West Hampstead Community Association, and Sue spoke to give her experiences of running the Sidings Community Centre.
8). Vice-Chair’s items:
(a). Maria had emailed to complain about the empty 139 buses using Mill Lane. She said the road was unsuitable for double-decker buses, but if they had to use the road they should pick up passengers. James mentioned that the buses often mounted the pavements on Mill Lane.
(b). There is concern about the future of the former NHS care home at 85-87 Fordwych Road. The home has been closed down & the ground floor windows have been boarded up. James said it was not to be confused with the Carr-Gomm home, which press reports said had closed down but is actually still running. James said he would contact the PCT estates department to find out what the plans for the property are.
Sue said the boarding-up of the windows was unsightly and an advert to criminals. There was concern about possible future development of the site, particularly after the plans for 1 Mill Lane.
Sue mentioned that Dusty Springfield was born there. There was a suggestion that there should be a blue plaque on the building.
Lola suggested getting Tree Protection Orders on the trees at the front of the property.
9). Other items:
None
10). Next meeting:
The next meeting will be on Thursday 2nd April at 7.30pm in the Common Room of Davina House, 59a Fordwych Road.